In a powerful May 5, 2025 interview with investigative journalist Greg Hunter, biotech analyst and former Pfizer contractor Karen Kingston laid out an alarming case that the COVID-19 mRNA injections were never safe or properly tested… and worse, that the U.S. government had ongoing access to data showing this and did nothing to stop it.
.
Key Points from the Interview
1. Shedding Was Known and Intentional
Kingston asserted that vaccine shedding – where unvaccinated individuals are affected by being near vaccinated people – was a known and documented risk in Pfizer’s original new drug application. She cited Section 10 of the application, which warned that pregnant women should avoid even indirect contact with vaccinated individuals, including second-hand exposure through family members.
2. Dangerous Adverse Effects and Cover-Up
Kingston revealed that 80% of pregnancies reported during the trials resulted in loss (miscarriages, stillbirths, or severe birth defects), possibly due to shedding or direct exposure. Yet these women were not necessarily injected themselves. This data, she says, was minimized or buried, and the risk to children was outright ignored.
In one well-known case, a 12-year-old girl named Maddie was paralyzed and placed on a feeding tube, but her injury was falsely recorded as a “tummy ache”.
3. Clinical Trial Fraud and Unblinding
Kingston described a process of deliberate fraud in Pfizer’s clinical trials, including the unblinding of participants, shuffling vaccine-injured subjects into the placebo group, and failing to report serious adverse events. She referenced whistleblower Brook Jackson, who was fired after reporting protocol violations in Pfizer’s trials. According to Kingston, the FDA was aware of these issues but granted emergency use authorization anyway.
4. Pfizer’s Legal Immunity Should Be Void
The vaccine manufacturers’ liability protections under U.S. law can be nullified if fraud or intentional misinformation is proven. Kingston claims the government’s own admissions confirm that Pfizer and U.S. agencies conspired to withhold safety data, thereby nullifying legal immunity and opening the door to lawsuits.
5. COVID-19 Injections Match the Definition of a Bioweapon
Kingston emphasized that under President Trump’s new Executive Order (EO-14292 05 May 2025), “dangerous gain-of-function research” is defined as scientific research that enhances the ability of pathogens to cause harm. By that definition, Kingston argues, the COVID-19 mRNA injections qualify as a bioweapon. She explained that the shots use gene-editing technology and are built on a platform originally intended for aggressive cancer therapies, often involving combinations of viral elements like Ebola, HIV, and herpes.
6. Deceptive Language and Shifting Terminology
Kingston warned that even as public awareness grows, the industry is using new language to obscure ongoing gain-of-function research, such as terms like “nucleotide substitution” and “precision health.” She noted that DARPA is still funding research involving synthetic gene modification under new labels, often outside public view.
7. Impacts on Health, Economy, and National Security
Citing data from financial analyst Edward Dowd, Kingston linked the mRNA rollout to increased mortality and disability among working-age adults, overburdened healthcare systems, and growing demands on Medicare and Social Security. She framed this as a deliberate weakening of national resilience, both physically and economically.
Conclusion: A Call for Accountability
Karen Kingston argues that the pandemic response was not merely a medical failure, it was a systemic act of fraud involving both government agencies and pharmaceutical companies. Her hope is that the legal groundwork is now in place for criminal accountability, and she urges the public to stay informed, speak out, and demand action.
“They knew it was dangerous. They knew it was ineffective. They knew it would injure and kill people – and they pushed it anyway,” Kingston said.
This interview serves as a sobering reminder that science without ethics is a threat, and transparency is more crucial than ever in biomedical policy and public health.