A groundbreaking new study, described by Dr. John Campbell as “the most definitive yet,” has ignited serious concerns about the safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines—particularly their link to myocarditis, or heart inflammation. Published in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Research and Innovation, this peer-reviewed paper compiles a vast array of global research into one authoritative source, offering a comprehensive analysis of the risks posed by mRNA vaccine technology.
Massive Spike in Adverse Events Post-Vaccine Rollout
Using data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the study highlights a dramatic surge in reported adverse events and deaths following the 2021 vaccine rollout. While it’s true that more vaccines were administered that year, the increase in adverse events was 6.2 times higher than expected, even after adjusting for vaccination volume. Deaths attributed to vaccine complications also exceeded 10,000 in 2021 alone.
A Closer Look at the Study
The paper titled “Myocarditis After SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination: Epidemiology, Outcomes and New Perspectives” spans 43 pages and includes 341 references. It synthesizes data from clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance, epidemiological studies, and immunological findings.
The authors conclude:
“We urge governments to remove COVID-19 mRNA products from the market due to the well-documented risk of myocardial damage, particularly in young males under 40.”
mRNA vs. Traditional Vaccines: Alarming Differences
The study emphasizes that mRNA vaccines, unlike traditional vaccines, distribute lipid nanoparticles throughout the body. These particles deliver mRNA to cells, including heart muscle cells, which then produce spike proteins. These proteins remain attached to cell membranes, triggering the immune system to attack the cells, potentially causing permanent heart damage.
Key Findings:
-
Young Males Most at Risk: Males aged 12 to 24 showed up to 7x higher incidence of myocarditis following Moderna shots compared to females.
-
Moderna vs. Pfizer: Moderna’s mRNA vaccine was linked to 3 to 5x higher myocarditis rates than Pfizer, possibly due to higher mRNA dosage.
-
Hospitalization Rates: 84 to 96% of myocarditis cases required hospitalization, and 50% showed long-term cardiac abnormalities.
-
Long-Term Damage: In some cases, scar tissue was found in the heart muscle, indicating irreversible damage.
Misconceptions Addressed
The paper debunks several commonly held beliefs:
-
“Infection causes more myocarditis than the vaccine.”
Refuted. The study found higher myocarditis risk from vaccination, especially in young people. -
“Vaccine-induced myocarditis is rare and mild.”
Refuted. Evidence shows long-term heart damage and a 10 to 20% fatality rate in some cases. -
“The benefits outweigh the risks.”
Refuted. For young and healthy individuals, especially children and adolescents, the study argues the risk-benefit ratio does not support continued mRNA vaccine use.
Expert Commentary: Dr. Kurt Milhoan Weighs In
In an interview on Fox News, pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kurt Milhoan, a senior fellow at the Independent Medical Alliance, supported the study’s conclusions. He cited:
-
Long-term heart inflammation seen in vaccinated youth
-
Evidence of persistent spike protein in the body for up to 700 days
-
A strong correlation between the number of vaccine doses and increased myocarditis risk
Milhoan emphasized that young people, especially healthy children, face minimal risk from COVID-19 itself and should not be subjected to this level of vaccine-related danger.
Final Thoughts
This paper is now open-access and available to the public. It presents a sobering reassessment of the safety profile of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for young males. Dr. Campbell urges regulators and governments to review this new data seriously, especially as many countries continue to promote or mandate mRNA vaccines.
To access the full study, visit the International Journal of Cardiovascular Research and Innovation.
These mRNA “vaccines” had no benefit for preventing CV19 infection or transmission, but have proven to deliver great harm to millions. And we are also seeing decreases in fertility – a nice “slow kill” technique.
The world has been witness to mass murder and harm. Where are the Nuremburg 2 trials to bring those who delivered this to account? Do those monstrous criminals get to walk free, never to stand in account?